1970
DOI: 10.1029/jc075i006p01117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of tower influence on wind velocity for NASA's 150-meter meteorological tower and a wind tunnel model of the tower

Abstract: A comparison of tower influence on wind speed and direction measurements is presented for NASA's 150‐meter meteorological tower and for a one‐eighth scale wind tunnel model of that tower. Data for the comparison were obtained from a full‐scale tower program performed at the 150‐meter Meteorological Tower Facility at Kennedy Space Center, Florida, and from a wind tunnel program at the Langley Research Center, Virginia. The full‐scale test results are in agreement with the results obtained in the wind tunnel.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore Izumi and Barad (1970) used for this purpose an empirical combination of flow speed variations measured around various triangular masts by Gill et al (1967) and by Hathorn and Kaufman (1968). The use of triangular-mast information for assessment of flow effects around a square mast is a doubtful approach, since even for similarly shaped masts, the flow may be significantly varied by minor construction details (Camp and Kaufman, 1970). Even so, it is not certain that Izumi and Barad's approach would result in a systematic error.…”
Section: Mast Structure and Available Data On Mast Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore Izumi and Barad (1970) used for this purpose an empirical combination of flow speed variations measured around various triangular masts by Gill et al (1967) and by Hathorn and Kaufman (1968). The use of triangular-mast information for assessment of flow effects around a square mast is a doubtful approach, since even for similarly shaped masts, the flow may be significantly varied by minor construction details (Camp and Kaufman, 1970). Even so, it is not certain that Izumi and Barad's approach would result in a systematic error.…”
Section: Mast Structure and Available Data On Mast Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, obstacles which are not localized on the platform (such as the ladder) would rather make the composite obstruction effect similar to that of a vertical cylinder, with little or no upflow. A wind-tunnel experiment would be desirable, though it seems to be rather difficult to determine flow directions with hot wires to the required accuracy (Camp and Kaufman, 1970;Hunt, 1971).…”
Section: Of Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, errors in the measurement of wind velocity have come from the effects of the mast or tower used for supporting the instruments. The so-called "tower effects" have been studied by many authors, such as Sanuki et al (1955), Rider (1966), Shiotani and Takahashi (1962), Thornthwaite et al (1962), Borovenko et al (1963), Gill et al (1967), Mollo-Christensen (1967), Dabberdt (1968aDabberdt ( , 1968b, Cermak and Horn (1968), Camp and Kaufman (1970) and Izumi and Barad (1970). General findings from the studies of these authors are as follows : 1) On the windward side of a tower the wind speed decreases, although the speed measured on the transverse side of the tower increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McVehil and Camnitz (1969) Camp and Kaufman (1970) McVehil and Camnitz (1969) Sanders and Weber (1970), Hanafusa and Mitsuta (1971), Sinclair et al (1973) Instruments and data handling: Mast influence on observation: Data source, review: Carter (1970) Carter (1970, Angel1 and Bernstein (1976) Crawford and Hudson (1970), Goff and Hudson (1972), Cormier (1975) Frankenberger (1955), Franken (1962) Frankenberger (1955, Franken (1962) Tops of three separate masts Frankenberger (1968) Rijkoort et a[. (1970), Raaff (1975) Rijkoort et a[.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%