1998
DOI: 10.1039/a705516a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of total vaporisation and dynamic headspace techniques combined with direct mass spectrometric detection for the on-line analysis of liquid process streams

Abstract: A comparison of dynamic gas purging headspace-mass spectrometry and total vaporisation-mass spectrometry for the on-line analysis of liquid process streams was made. The detection limits (3s) for acetone in an aqueous matrix for the dynamic headspace and total vaporisation techniques are 0.4 and 11.2 ml ml 21 , respectively. The relative standard deviations for the determination of 100 ml ml 21 and 10% aqueous acetone solutions, respectively, are 9.5 and 1.9% for the dynamic headspace technique and 4.4 and 3.7… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applications of headspace analysis benefit either from the simplicity of automation or from removing some of the matrix effects. However, one study found that even dynamic headspace techniques could not eliminate the effect of the sample matrix on analysis if the analytes were incompletely extracted [63]. A table comparing the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques is available in our previous study [51].…”
Section: Sample Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of headspace analysis benefit either from the simplicity of automation or from removing some of the matrix effects. However, one study found that even dynamic headspace techniques could not eliminate the effect of the sample matrix on analysis if the analytes were incompletely extracted [63]. A table comparing the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques is available in our previous study [51].…”
Section: Sample Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix effect influences the volatility of each dissolved compound to a different degree; therefore, the purge time needed to achieve an exhaustive extraction for each compound will also vary. Dunn et al [33] have found that the dynamic headspace technique suffers from dependence of the calibration data on the sample matrix composition, thus making complicated multivariate calibration techniques necessary to obtain accurate results.…”
Section: Comparison Of Static Hs-gc With Pandtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermal vaporisation of discrete liquid samples into a process mass spectrometer has been achieved using heated auto-injection valves [34][35][36], a modified GC oven [37], and a programmable temperature vaporizing (PTV) GC injector and syringe pump [38]. However, these methods are not ideal for continuous sampling; when a carrier gas is used to transport the sample vapours to the mass spectrometer variations in the carrier gas flow and inefficient mixing with the sample vapour can cause signal instability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%