2019
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.19.00258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Topical and Intravenous Tranexamic Acid for Total Knee Replacement

Abstract: Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic drug. Topical administration of TXA during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is favored for certain patients because of concerns about thrombotic complications, despite a lack of supporting literature. We compared local and systemic levels of thrombogenic markers, interleukin (IL)-6, and TXA between patients who received intravenous (IV) TXA and those who received topical TXA. Methods: Seventy-six pat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The random-effects model ( P < 0.001, I 2 = 91%) was used for analysis, and there was no significant difference between the IV and IA groups (MD = − 0.34, 95% CI = − 0.70 to 0.02, P = 0.07). Regarding the high heterogeneity, a sensitivity analysis was performed and two studies were excluded [ 14 , 48 ], then we got a lower heterogeneity result ( P = 0.14, I 2 = 36%) by analyzing the rest of 8 studies including 839 patients with a fixed-effects model. No significant difference was shown between the IV and IA groups (MD = − 0.01, 95% CI = − 0.11 to 0.13, P = 0.86).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The random-effects model ( P < 0.001, I 2 = 91%) was used for analysis, and there was no significant difference between the IV and IA groups (MD = − 0.34, 95% CI = − 0.70 to 0.02, P = 0.07). Regarding the high heterogeneity, a sensitivity analysis was performed and two studies were excluded [ 14 , 48 ], then we got a lower heterogeneity result ( P = 0.14, I 2 = 36%) by analyzing the rest of 8 studies including 839 patients with a fixed-effects model. No significant difference was shown between the IV and IA groups (MD = − 0.01, 95% CI = − 0.11 to 0.13, P = 0.86).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy and safety of IV versus topical TXA are still debated; however, most studies have shown that both routes are equally effective in reducing the level of bleeding. 5 , 7 , 14 Jules-Elysee et al 14 compared topical and IV TXA for total knee arthroplasty and demonstrated that IV TXA resulted in higher wound concentrations, suggesting that the wound was the major site of action despite the mode of administration; lower systemic TXA levels were observed in the topical group; but both were within therapeutic range. In terms of safety, there is now emerging evidence that IV TXA is not associated with increased complications in patients with a history of thrombotic events and does not increase the risk of perioperative seizures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A randomized controlled trial study by Jules-Elysee et al. [ 34 ] compared serum TXA levels between patients who received intravenous TXA (2 g) and IA-TXA (3 g). The intravenous group received 1 g before tourniquet inflation and 1 g at 3 hours later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%