2013
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of timing abnormalities leading to penetration versus aspiration during the oropharyngeal swallow

Abstract: Objectives/Hypothesis: Penetration and aspiration during the oropharyngeal swallow have different clinical implications. This study examined temporal measures made from modified barium swallow examinations that might differentiate the two events.Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: Temporal measures of swallows of male patients with penetration only on the modified barium swallow study, those who showed aspiration (during the swallow), and normal control subjects were compared.Results: Significan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of articles that met inclusion criteria are displayed in Table 2. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The prevalence of symptomatic dysphagia among patients with UVFI, as identified by self-reporting or clinical evaluation, was 55.6% to 69.0%. In studies that identified swallowing dysfunction mechanistically through videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) or functional endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), the aspiration rate ranged from 20.0% to 50.0%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The characteristics of articles that met inclusion criteria are displayed in Table 2. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The prevalence of symptomatic dysphagia among patients with UVFI, as identified by self-reporting or clinical evaluation, was 55.6% to 69.0%. In studies that identified swallowing dysfunction mechanistically through videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) or functional endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), the aspiration rate ranged from 20.0% to 50.0%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen studies went beyond merely identifying dysphagia among patients with UVFI and investigated the mechanism and kinetics of the disordered swallow by measuring pathophysiologic and temporal endpoints (Table 4). 8,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][19][20][21][22][23] Aspiration was reported in 10 studies, followed by pharyngeal bolus residue in 7 studies, laryngeal penetration in 6 studies, and reduced UES opening or contractility in 4 studies. Prolonged TPT time, epiglottis immobility, paresis of pharyngeal constrictor muscles, and reduced laryngeal elevation were separate outcomes in 3 studies, while 2 studies examined delayed initiation in pharyngeal swallowing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integrity and timing of LVC are critical for preventing penetration–aspiration ( Rofes et al, 2010 ; Steele et al, 2015 ), while short duration of LVC (LVCDur) may be related to aspiration risk. The data regarding LVC after Radiation Therapy (RT) are unclear regarding whether deficits exist in the integrity, timing, or duration of closure ( Kotz et al, 2004 ; Nativ-Zeltzer et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Factors Related To Swallowing Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies suggest that the risk of penetration and aspiration is much higher in situations of incomplete LVC ( Steele et al, 2015 ; Vose & Humbert, 2018 ). Prolonged time-to-LVC, previously called “LVC reaction time” ( Humbert et al, 2018 ; Steele et al, 2019 ), is also thought to be a characteristic that increases the risk of penetration and aspiration ( Nativ-Zeltzer et al, 2014 ; Steele et al, 2015 ). Longer time-to-LVC has been found to differentiate between PAS scores of 1 and 2 in a sample of healthy older adults recently reported by Herzberg et al (2019) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%