“…Furthermore, the conductivity distributions reconstructed in the ROI by inverse methods can represent the arbitrary defect location and shape [88,152]. Through the various scanning modes shown in Figure 20, it has been proposed that among the features of |H( f , x, y)|, Arg{H( f , x, y)}, |Γ(t, x, y)|, and Arg{Γ (t, x, y)} (Γ(t, x, y) = H(t, x, y) + j{H(t, x, y)}, {•} represents the Hilbert transform) and Arg{Γ (t, x, y)} can characterize the defects in relatively deeper locations of test pieces [153]. The distribution of the measured magnetic field approximates to the Hermite-Gaussian (HG) modes which are solutions of analytical function [154], i.e., paraxial wave equations in Cartesian coordinates [155].…”