2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) values to oral reference dose (RfD) values

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In more detail, DIPTE values for PTEs showed the following order (mg/kg/day): Zn > Cu > Ni > Pb > Cr > U > V > Cd > Co > Sb, from the most to the less relevant element from a biological point of view. Moreover, when DIPTE values are compared with their respective reference dose (R fd ; Table 4), the consumption of AdV cloves resulted in an uptake of PTEs several orders of magnitude lower than the maximal oral reference dose which guarantees acceptable human exposure limits [43]. In addition, the HRI values of all the investigated PTEs (Table 4) were at least 100 times lower than the threshold of 1 (HRI << 1), indicative of no risk for human health as well as the complete improbability to develop carcinogenic effects [44].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more detail, DIPTE values for PTEs showed the following order (mg/kg/day): Zn > Cu > Ni > Pb > Cr > U > V > Cd > Co > Sb, from the most to the less relevant element from a biological point of view. Moreover, when DIPTE values are compared with their respective reference dose (R fd ; Table 4), the consumption of AdV cloves resulted in an uptake of PTEs several orders of magnitude lower than the maximal oral reference dose which guarantees acceptable human exposure limits [43]. In addition, the HRI values of all the investigated PTEs (Table 4) were at least 100 times lower than the threshold of 1 (HRI << 1), indicative of no risk for human health as well as the complete improbability to develop carcinogenic effects [44].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For HFPO-DA, the TTC value is 433-fold higher than the RfD. As noted in Pham et al (2020) , a cursory examination of chemicals where the TTC value is significantly higher than corresponding RfD value indicated potential need for reevaluation of the RfD due to outdated methodology or overapplication/compounding of uncertainty factors. The fact that the RfD for HFPO-DA is significantly lower than the Cramer Class III TTC provides an additional line of evidence indicating that the RfD for HFPO-DA is overly conservative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The expansion of the chemical space via the addition of PFAS resulted in a fifth percentile NOAEL value of 1.3 µg/kg-day (0.0013 mg/kg-day). An earlier evaluation demonstrated that, on average, Cramer Class III TTC values are ∼6-fold lower than corresponding IRIS values for the same chemical ( Pham et al , 2020 ), indicating that TTC values, which are generally used in data-poor situations, are more conservative than detailed risk assessment toxicity values (eg, RfDs). For HFPO-DA, the TTC value is 433-fold higher than the RfD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exposure-driven risk assessment can be used to compare the expected exposure with the level of exposure that results in adverse effects as a basis of dictating whether further detailed experimental testing is needed. Early exposure-driven testing has made use of thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC) to prioritize the risk assessment of substances which require more data. This concept has been used for food, cosmetics, , and pharmaceuticals.…”
Section: Green Toxicology: the Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%