2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of threshold determination methods for the deceleration rate to avoid a crash (DRAC)-based crash estimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same is the case with the variable “vehicles > 10 years”, which is significant with a positive coefficient in the three models, indicating that the age of the vehicle affects the number of victims per accident. This result coincides with that obtained by Anderson and Searson [ 60 ] who observed that the risk of accident seemed to be the lowest when vehicles were two years old, and increased as they aged. In an analysis carried out in Australia and New Zealand, Smith [ 81 ] observed that the oldest vehicles were over-represented in the deaths of their occupants during the period 2012–2016.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same is the case with the variable “vehicles > 10 years”, which is significant with a positive coefficient in the three models, indicating that the age of the vehicle affects the number of victims per accident. This result coincides with that obtained by Anderson and Searson [ 60 ] who observed that the risk of accident seemed to be the lowest when vehicles were two years old, and increased as they aged. In an analysis carried out in Australia and New Zealand, Smith [ 81 ] observed that the oldest vehicles were over-represented in the deaths of their occupants during the period 2012–2016.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some recent studies have attempted to account for unobserved heterogeneity using random effect (RE) terms representing between-site variances, which are consistent for extremes in the same site but vary between different sites [ 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 ]. This approach, while representing an improvement over models that do not account for unobserved heterogeneity, still has limitations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, some limitations in this study merit further study. Firstly, the psychological characteristics that affect pedestrian crossing violations should be further explored to refine the influencing factors; secondly, the model assumes that the indicator variables can be obtained by actual observation, a limitation that can be handled by a Hidden Markov Model; thirdly, the research results can be extended for a traffic flow assessment [28,29] to improve road safety analysis [30,31]. Finally, more pedestrian crossing data from multiple types of intersections are needed to validate the proposed model in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…00 ( , ) xy is the coordinate of vehicle center position. is the angle between the speed direction and the connecting line, which connects a point and midpoint on the equal field intensity circle. Bring the water drop line model into (4) to obtain the kinetic energy field model shown in (6).…”
Section: ) Driving Risk Field Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deterministic method usually used the conflict indicators of time, distance, and deceleration to distinguish whether the vehicle collision occur. Many scholars used the single conflict indicator to evaluate vehicle collision risk [3], [4], [5], [6]. These researches showed that using different indicator has different evaluation result [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%