1983
DOI: 10.1080/00275514.1983.12023713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Techniques for the Study of Aquatic Hyphomycete Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The inhospitality of the substrate surface, microbivory, or active interference among fungal species during conidial attachment or germination might be responsible for such a decline. At least during later stages, there is little evidence for interference between mycelia of different species of aquatic hyphomycetes, since considerable interspecific intermingling of hyphae occurs at very small spatial scales (11,28). We are currently examining the earliest phase of fungal colonization to determine if this stage presents a bottleneck for later fungal diversity on decaying leaves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inhospitality of the substrate surface, microbivory, or active interference among fungal species during conidial attachment or germination might be responsible for such a decline. At least during later stages, there is little evidence for interference between mycelia of different species of aquatic hyphomycetes, since considerable interspecific intermingling of hyphae occurs at very small spatial scales (11,28). We are currently examining the earliest phase of fungal colonization to determine if this stage presents a bottleneck for later fungal diversity on decaying leaves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preparation of leaf discs for the assessment of fungal sporulation followed in general Shearer and Lane [20]. Leaf discs were incubated in their respective wells, filled with 2 ml of deionized water for 96 h at 20 AE 18C on an orbital shaker set at 55 rpm.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Leaf-associated Microbial Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could not use Skellam's competition model (1951) which assumes that competitors cannot coexist in the same patch. Such local exclusion is not true for unit-restricted fungi, which coexist inside each unit, such as a leaf (Shearer & Lane, 1983) or a coniferous needle (Kendrick & Burges, 1962), and form ''unit-communities'' (Swift, 1984). However, competition occurs inside units and decreases the spore production of both species (Zak & Rabatin, 1997;Newton et al, 1998) according to a pure propagule production competition model (Klausmeier, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%