2003
DOI: 10.1136/jcp.56.10.769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three stool antigen tests for Helicobacter pylori detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with previous studies on this test, with reports of sensitivity and specificity in the range of 88.5%-98% and 93.8%-99%, respectively (23,27,28). These studies have, however, not addressed the effect of PPIs on test performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in accordance with previous studies on this test, with reports of sensitivity and specificity in the range of 88.5%-98% and 93.8%-99%, respectively (23,27,28). These studies have, however, not addressed the effect of PPIs on test performance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In general, PPI therapy is known to interfere with H. pylori diagnosis; it diminishes H. pylori load and enzyme activity, leading to lower sensitivity of both invasive tests and urea breath tests (20). The use of PPIs has been shown to affect the outcome of the polyclonal antibody-based H. pylori stool antigen test (21)(22)(23). However, there are no published data on the effect of PPI treatment on test results of monoclonal antibody-based tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this permits us to think that this large difference is related to antigenic diversity between the two strains, it would be a premature conclusion, since the methods of evaluation were different; furthermore, more analysis with larger numbers of H. pylori strains is required to determine the analytical sensitivity for an HpSA test. A variety of experiments have been performed with HpSA tests, including Premier Platinum HpSA, Immuno Card STAT HpSA, and FemtoLab H. pylori CnX (1,2,12,15,16,18,20,(39)(40)(41). However, no uniformity was observed in different populations in regard to the cutoff level required to consider the test positive or negative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a low-cost, rapid diagnostic technique may be useful for the management of H. pylori infection in children and adolescents from developing regions. The H. pylori stool antigen test has been introduced as a noninvasive, simple, relatively inexpensive, and reliable assay in the diagnosis of H. pylori infection of gastritis or peptic ulcer in adults and children (1,2,15,17). Although it is not yet at the level to replace histology as a gold standard, it may be a promising tool in detection of H. pylori infection and could be used in the follow-up of adults and children undergoing antibiotic therapy (5,8,12,18,20,23,24,29,32,33,38,39,41).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fecal antigen test is a noninvasive method of diagnosis of H. pylori antigens in the feces of patients suspected of having an active H. pylori infection (Andrews et al 2003). Studies have proved the accuracy of the fecal antigen test named the H. pylori stool antigen (HpSA) test for detection of H. pylori infection (Iranikhah et al 2013).…”
Section: Noninvasive Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%