Comparison of three reanalysis‐driven regional climate models over New Zealand: Climatology and extreme events

Abstract

Three ~12‐km reanalysis‐driven regional climate models (RCMs) are evaluated in terms of capturing climatologies and extremes of precipitation, temperature and surface wind over Aotearoa/New Zealand (NZ). NZ provides an excellent case study for evaluating high‐resolution RCMs due to its coastal and complex terrain and isolated geographical position in the midlatitudes, exposed to both tropical and polar influences. Overall, we find that the RCMs faithfully reproduce the observed climate, with precipitation and temperature climatologies particularly well‐captured. However, the RCMs display significant differences from observations in capturing the surface wind climatology, highlighting a remaining key challenge. The excess “drizzle problem” is apparent to varying degrees, leading to a weaker representation in the length of meteorological drought in some regions. The RCMs also diverge in reproducing diurnal temperature range which appears partly related to cloud cover. Finally, we discuss the important role of observational uncertainty in the context of model evaluation.