23rd AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference 2017
DOI: 10.2514/6.2017-4181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Popular Methods for the Prediction of High Speed Propeller Noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, aeroacoustic simulations historically have relatively simple flow field models and approximations. Because of that, several works have been developed recently to both predict propellers' noise [17][18][19] and enhance their design [20]. A common issue with these methods is their validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, aeroacoustic simulations historically have relatively simple flow field models and approximations. Because of that, several works have been developed recently to both predict propellers' noise [17][18][19] and enhance their design [20]. A common issue with these methods is their validation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%