2018
DOI: 10.7883/yoken.jjid.2017.297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Molecular Subtyping Methods among O157 and Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> Isolates from Japanese Cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reports indicate a wide variety of serotypes and sequence types of STEC isolated in Iran, Japan, Argentina, Brazil, among others, from diverse sources. Many of these studies have used techniques such as MLST, traditional serotyping, and PFGE to study STEC isolates (Feng et al, 2014;Cadona et al, 2016;Ferdous et al, 2016;Jajarmi et al, 2017;Nakamura et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports indicate a wide variety of serotypes and sequence types of STEC isolated in Iran, Japan, Argentina, Brazil, among others, from diverse sources. Many of these studies have used techniques such as MLST, traditional serotyping, and PFGE to study STEC isolates (Feng et al, 2014;Cadona et al, 2016;Ferdous et al, 2016;Jajarmi et al, 2017;Nakamura et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methods for typing of E. coli from environmental samples including traditional and modern molecular methods [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. With the advent of the molecular age, scientists changed their approach from phenotyping to genotyping methods [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%