2011
DOI: 10.5370/jeet.2011.6.6.799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Modeling Methods for Identifying Unknown Magnetization of Ferromagnetic Thin Plate

Abstract: -This study presents three different magnetization models for identifying unknown magnetization of the ferromagnetic thin plate of a ship. First, the forward problem should be solved to accurately predict outboard magnetic fields due to the magnetization distribution estimated at a certain time. To achieve this, three different modeling methods for representing remanent magnetization (i.e., magnetic charge method, magnetic dipole array method, and magnetic moment method) were utilized. Material sensitivity for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements were performed below the ship's keel, at normal measurement depth [7]. The measurement set denoted Bz_nava is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Between Simulation Results and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Measurements were performed below the ship's keel, at normal measurement depth [7]. The measurement set denoted Bz_nava is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Comparison Between Simulation Results and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods of modeling the induced magnetic signature have been employed throughout the years, ranging from physical scale models to analytical models [7,13] simple models, such as the dipole array method, or numerical models relying on high computing power calculators [10,15,20]. Modeling the ship complex geometry can predict its magnetic signature, by employing suitable numerical tools, such as the finite element method, which take into account the material properties, and the external magnetic field [5,16,21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%