Comparison of three mobile devices for measuring R–R intervals and heart rate variability: Polar S810i, Suunto t6 and an ambulatory ECG system

Abstract

The first aim of this study was to compare an ambulatory five-lead ECG system with the commercially available breast belt measuring devices; Polar S810i and Suunto t6, in terms of R-R interval measures and heart rate variability (HRV) indices. The second aim was to compare different HRV spectral analysis methods. Nineteen young males (aged between 22 and 31 years, median 24 years) underwent simultaneous R-R interval recordings with the three instruments during supine and sitting rest, moderate dynamic, and moderate to vigorous static exercise of the upper and lower limb. For each subject, 17 R-R interval series of 3-min length were extracted from the whole recordings and then analyzed in frequency domain using (1) a fast Fourier transform (FFT), (2) an autoregressive model (AR), (3) a Welch periodogram (WP) and (4) a continuous wavelet transform (CWT). Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LoA) method served as criteria for measurement agreement. Regarding the R-R interval recordings, ICC (lower ICC 95% confidence interval >0.99) as well as LoA (maximum LoA: -15.1 to 14.3 ms for ECG vs. Polar) showed an excellent agreement between all devices. Therefore, the three instruments may be used interchangeably in recording and interpolation of R-R intervals. ICCs for HRV frequency parameters were also high, but in most cases LoA analysis revealed unacceptable discrepancies between the instruments. The agreement among the different frequency transform methods can be taken for granted when analyzing the normalized power in low and high frequency ranges; however, not when analyzing the absolute values.

Favouring emotional processing in improvisational music therapy through resonance frequency breathing: a single-case experimental study with a healthy client

“…The Memory Belt has a 1000 Hz sampling rate (i.e. 1 ms accuracy), and it has been shown to be reliable when compared to a 5-lead electrocardiogram system (Weippert et al, 2010). Data pre-processing and analysis were performed with version 2.2 of Kubios, an HRV analysis software developed at the University of Eastern Finland (Tarvainen, Niskanen, Lipponen, Ranta-aho, & Karjalainen, 2014).…”

Exercise Induced Autonomic Disengagement and Pain in Women Presenting FM and Healthy Women: Analgesia and Blood Pressure

“…Before the exercise test, HRVwas recorded over 5 minutes during a supine rest. HRV was recorded using a Polar RS 800CX heart rate monitor (Polar electro, Kempele, Finland) that performs HRV recordings [16]. HR and blood pressure were measured after 10 minutes of supine rest.…”

Heart rate variability in individuals with thoracic spinal cord injury

“…The validity of this device, was compared with an electrocardiogram, is intraclass correlation coefficient 40.99. 19 Data acquisition lasted 15 m and were performed in a room with a temperature between 20 and 22°C, with no noise or uncomfortable atmosphere. The participants were asked to remain silent and attempt to maintain their breathing rate as low as possible, without speaking or moving.…”