2000
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.192-195.613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Methods in Evaluation of Bone Ingrowth into Porous Bioactive Glass and Titanium Implants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A scanning electron microscope (SEM) (LEO s 360, former Cambridge Instruments Ltd., Cambridge Instruments, Cambridge, UK) equipped with a backscattered electron detector was used for backscattered electron imaging (BEI‐SEM). Computerized image analysis of BEI‐SEM micrographs, based on the analysis of multiple shades of gray, allows accurate differentiation of mineralized and unmineralized bone ingrowth tissues of metal implant surfaces in real time 15–17. In the current study, BEI‐SEM was applied to measure the true size of laser‐made pores and to determine the quantity and porosity of the ingrown bone.…”
Section: Methods Of Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scanning electron microscope (SEM) (LEO s 360, former Cambridge Instruments Ltd., Cambridge Instruments, Cambridge, UK) equipped with a backscattered electron detector was used for backscattered electron imaging (BEI‐SEM). Computerized image analysis of BEI‐SEM micrographs, based on the analysis of multiple shades of gray, allows accurate differentiation of mineralized and unmineralized bone ingrowth tissues of metal implant surfaces in real time 15–17. In the current study, BEI‐SEM was applied to measure the true size of laser‐made pores and to determine the quantity and porosity of the ingrown bone.…”
Section: Methods Of Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We studied three different bioactive glass compositions (13‐93, 1‐98, and 3‐98; Table I). Glasses 1‐98 and 3‐98 were modified from glass 13‐93, which has previously been used in the field of bioactive glass research 13, 15, 16, 23. In glass 1‐98, the P 2 O 5 was decreased from 4 to 2 wt %, and 1 wt % B 2 O 3 was added to compare the composition of glass 13‐93.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet the different demands of clinical needs, an interesting advantage of bioactive glasses is that their reactivity can be adjusted by choice of glass composition, as shown in in vitro and in vivo studies 2, 13–15. Furthermore, in the context of these properties of bioactive glasses, it has been shown that with porous bioactive glass implants, it is possible to achieve significantly enhanced, new bone ingrowth compared to similar porous titanium implants 16…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, staining methods such as the rhodamine method for copper can identify free copper but not the copper bound in copper proteins (2 ). Other methods, such as scanning nuclear microprobes (1 ), microPIXE (3 ), secondary ion mass spectrometry (4,5 ), laser microprobe mass analysis (6 ), energy-dispersive x-ray analysis (7)(8)(9), and electron probe x-ray microanalysis (10 ), suffer from either low precision or poor detection limits. Laser microprobe mass analysis, however, is an ideal technique for the determination of trace element distribution in biological samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%