2015
DOI: 10.1007/s40846-015-0085-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Three Fixation Methods for Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults: Experimental and Numerical Investigations

Abstract: Femoral neck fractures in young patients are usually caused by a high-energy trauma, which results in a perpendicular fracture. Although efforts are focused on preserving the femoral head in young patients, vertical femoral neck fracture is a problematic orthopedic injury due to the domination of shear forces. Due to controversy regarding which fixation method is the best choice, the purpose of this study was to find the most stable fixation method for this kind of fracture. This study includes experimental te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
71
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that there was a substantial difference in implant survival between the treatment groups, with the SHS superior to cannulated screws when internal fixation is used. According to the current literature, the stability of SHS fixation is superior to cannulated screws, particularly in vertical and basal fractures, which are more unstable [11][12][13][14]. Our results suggest that stable fixation may be more important in ADS patients, as many trauma patients continue to drink after sustaining an injury and thus may be less likely to follow mobility restrictions during postoperative rehabilitation [15,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…We found that there was a substantial difference in implant survival between the treatment groups, with the SHS superior to cannulated screws when internal fixation is used. According to the current literature, the stability of SHS fixation is superior to cannulated screws, particularly in vertical and basal fractures, which are more unstable [11][12][13][14]. Our results suggest that stable fixation may be more important in ADS patients, as many trauma patients continue to drink after sustaining an injury and thus may be less likely to follow mobility restrictions during postoperative rehabilitation [15,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…According to the contact method described in references [15,16], in an ankle model containing bones, cartilage, ligaments, and screws, the boundary condition of the contact between the bone surface and the cartilage surface was set to bind, and the start and stop points of ligaments which connect with the bone were set to bind. The transmission of force between bone and bone was realized by contact between cartilages.…”
Section: Contact Setting Constraints and Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, when the Pauwels angle and loads increased, the stresses and displacements of the femoral head and 26 . Several biomechanical studies 21,27,28 have revealed that the cannulated screw method of xation is not the best choice for vertical femoral neck fractures in young adults. Because single DHS xation has been shown to have a lower capacity to resist rotational forces compared with multiple cannulated screw xation, many scholars suggest inserting a derotational screw in parallel to the main DHS to overcome this limitation at the cost of a larger skin incision and the dissection of more soft tissue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%