1999 IEEE 49th Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.99CH36363)
DOI: 10.1109/vetec.1999.780571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three diversity handover algorithms by using measured propagation data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance of soft handover is closely related to the algorithm [17,20,21,23]. 2G CDMA networks used soft handover algorithm with fixed threshold [3,7,10] but 3G CDMA networks used relative Soft Handover Margin (SHM) [14] for enhancing performance. The soft handover margin is the maximum allowed difference, measured in dBm, between the received power from the best serving base station and the received power from a candidate base station to be included in the active set of the user equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of soft handover is closely related to the algorithm [17,20,21,23]. 2G CDMA networks used soft handover algorithm with fixed threshold [3,7,10] but 3G CDMA networks used relative Soft Handover Margin (SHM) [14] for enhancing performance. The soft handover margin is the maximum allowed difference, measured in dBm, between the received power from the best serving base station and the received power from a candidate base station to be included in the active set of the user equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%