2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03353-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…HD imaging systems allow for the visualization of micro‐tissue structures, including small vessels. Several studies have reported that this advantage is linked to less intraoperative blood loss 11‐13 . The median estimated blood loss of laparoscopic surgery groups of previous RCTs ranged 100‐105 mL for colon cancer surgery, 2,4,6,14 which was higher than the amount of blood loss in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…HD imaging systems allow for the visualization of micro‐tissue structures, including small vessels. Several studies have reported that this advantage is linked to less intraoperative blood loss 11‐13 . The median estimated blood loss of laparoscopic surgery groups of previous RCTs ranged 100‐105 mL for colon cancer surgery, 2,4,6,14 which was higher than the amount of blood loss in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The 3D‐laparoscopy is a good alternative for robotic surgery with equal optical conditions but less setup time and costs 9 . The novel 3D‐vision system shows also significant advantages in upper and lower abdominal surgery in the context of surgery time, blood loss, and error rates, especially in complex surgeries 27,28 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The novel 3D-vision system shows also significant advantages in upper and lower abdominal surgery in the context of surgery time, blood loss, and error rates, especially in complex surgeries. 27,28 Our study had several strengths and limitations. We excluded the first patients who underwent surgery in the period of the learning curve for 3D laparoscopy and sacrocolpopexy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that the intention of the simulator described in the article is not to train robust or complex surgical procedures, but to direct primary learning to an unfamiliar audience, especially with regard to the manipulation of instruments and main movements, adaptation to the 2D visual-spatial field, and motor coordination practices 6 , 15 . We should also mention that the simulated training of surgical skills improves manual skills and protects the learner and the patient due to the controlled environment, reducing the risk of iatrogenic episodes 2 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%