2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2010.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three different methods of moments for derivation of probability distribution parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(8), the weight func tions in the Gaussian case become of the form of the following equations: The estimation of the L-moments from a sample of size n from the random variable Y is discussed in Ref. [8]. Commonly used estimates are presented in the following equations:…”
Section: Derivation Of Distribution Parameters By L-momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(8), the weight func tions in the Gaussian case become of the form of the following equations: The estimation of the L-moments from a sample of size n from the random variable Y is discussed in Ref. [8]. Commonly used estimates are presented in the following equations:…”
Section: Derivation Of Distribution Parameters By L-momentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the main source of nonlinearity comes from Morison's equation, the parameter y2, the kurtosis coefficient of the response sampled time history, has been com puted by an approximation proposed by Najafian [8], As can be seen in Ref. [8], Eq. (40) showed to be much more efficient than conventional method of moments for high-kurtosis distributions …”
Section: Is Tr Ib U Tio N S O F T H E P Ro C E S S P E a K S A mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparison 1 is motivated by the increasing use of L-moments [1] in offshore engineering; e.g., for wave runup [2] and Morison drag [3]. This comparison is made with "Hermite" models, which assume the non-Gaussian response x{t) is a cubic (Hermite) transformation, either to or from a Gaussian process u{t) [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the three-parameter distribution model for describing the run-up measurements of a compliant platform was validated through a comparison with the experimental data and other theoretical models. Najafian [13] compared three different methods of moments to estimate the parameters of the Pierson-Holmes distribution [14], which was first introduced as a probability model for Morison wave loads of random waves. In most cases, the sampling variability of the parameter values determined from the two alternative methods of moments was much less than that of the conventional method of moments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%