2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2023.104990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three different deconvolution methods for analyzing nanoindentation test data of hydrated cement paste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gaussian mixture model (GMM) based on MLE method is a commonly used method of statistical nanoindentation technique in composite materials [7,10], which takes elastic modulus and hardness as the essential properties and simultaneously considers modulus and hardness in the deconvolution calculation process. The deconvolution process of the GMM and CDF in this study was consistent with that used in [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Gaussian mixture model (GMM) based on MLE method is a commonly used method of statistical nanoindentation technique in composite materials [7,10], which takes elastic modulus and hardness as the essential properties and simultaneously considers modulus and hardness in the deconvolution calculation process. The deconvolution process of the GMM and CDF in this study was consistent with that used in [14].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Combined with XRD and MIP analysis, there were 5 phases with varying mechanical properties in hydrated cement paste, including microscopic (MP), LD C-S-H, HD C-S-H, calcium hydroxide (CH), and anhydrate cement particles (CP). The ultra-high-density C-S-H was not divided in this study, which may be caused by the difference in the curing conditions of sample [14]. Fig.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%