2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three different bulk-filling techniques for restoring class II cavities: μCT, SEM-EDS combined analyses for margins and internal fit assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 In the research carried out by Putignano A. et al, 2 they compared three different restoration techniques, observing that the snow removal technique, which consists of 1) placing a thin layer of uncured fluid Bulk Fill composite as the lower lining of the cavity; 2) filling the rest of the cavity with a single increment of BFC compressible up to the occlusion surface, using high viscosity bulk composites and another low viscosity fluid, this improves adaptation to the cavity and decreases marginal microleakage. 2 Another study Tosco V. et al, 15 used micro-computerized tomography (µ-CT) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) together with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, to assess the degree of microleakage. 3 Using eight extracted human third molars and with two preparations of proximal, distal and oclussal cavities, using two filling techniques: BG (Bulk & Go group) which consists of restoring the cavity in a single increment, and BT (Traditional Bulk Group) which restores the proximal wall first and then treats it as a class I cavity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 In the research carried out by Putignano A. et al, 2 they compared three different restoration techniques, observing that the snow removal technique, which consists of 1) placing a thin layer of uncured fluid Bulk Fill composite as the lower lining of the cavity; 2) filling the rest of the cavity with a single increment of BFC compressible up to the occlusion surface, using high viscosity bulk composites and another low viscosity fluid, this improves adaptation to the cavity and decreases marginal microleakage. 2 Another study Tosco V. et al, 15 used micro-computerized tomography (µ-CT) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) together with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, to assess the degree of microleakage. 3 Using eight extracted human third molars and with two preparations of proximal, distal and oclussal cavities, using two filling techniques: BG (Bulk & Go group) which consists of restoring the cavity in a single increment, and BT (Traditional Bulk Group) which restores the proximal wall first and then treats it as a class I cavity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 16 This combined analysis makes it possible to obtain a proper visualisation of void formation on the tooth-restoration interface, providing reliable and objective information both on the morphology and chemical composition of the analysed samples. 17 Regarding the tooth-restoration interface, this method can be considered particularly helpful for researchers and clinicians, providing the opportunity to assess the effect of restorative procedures from different points of view, although further studies are needed to confirm the results obtained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of defects); the total surface of defects (DS, expressed in µm 2 ); the total volume of defects (DV, expressed in µm 3 ), the specific surface, defined as the ratio between the surface and the volume of the defects (DS/DV, expressed in µm -1 ); the mean thickness of void formation (mean thickness, expressed in µm); the volume of mineralised materials (enamel and dentin) and composite (MV, expressed in µm 3 ); and the ratio of the latter value to the total volume of the defect (DV/MV, expressed as a percentage). 16 17 The CT-Analyser software (ver. 1.17.7.2, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) was employed to create a 3D model of the defects of interest, coloured and superimposed onto 3D reconstructions of enamel, dentin, and restorations, by CTVOL software (ver.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But traditional periapical and panoramic films can only present 2D imaging of 3D structures. Some scholars also believe Micro-Ct of high resolution, which can show the adequate visualization of tooth internal structures ( Putignano et al, 2021 ). However, due to its high dose of radiation is not suitable for clinical practice, whereas cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can clearly display the 3D structures of internal tissues of the tooth, thus offering a better understanding of the anatomy of the root canal ( Venskutonis et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%