1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01975847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three-day and five-day courses of azithromycin in the treatment of atypical pneumonia

Abstract: This open, randomised clinical study, conducted from June 1988 to December 1989, included 84 patients with clinical and radiological findings of atypical pneumonia. All patients were treated with a total dose of 1.5 g azithromycin, a new azalide antibiotic. In Group I, azithromycin was administered for three days (500 mg once daily). In Group II, azithromycin was administered for five days (250 mg b.i.d. on day 1, followed by 250 mg once daily on days 2 to 5). Causative pathogens were identified by serological… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Azithromycin also appears to be clinically effective in the treatment of atypical pneumonia caused by Chlamydia spp. (13). However, there are no data on its microbiological efficacy in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azithromycin also appears to be clinically effective in the treatment of atypical pneumonia caused by Chlamydia spp. (13). However, there are no data on its microbiological efficacy in vivo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extremely high potency of azithromycin against M. pneumoniae and its long half-life probably account for its ability to cure M. pneumoniae infections with very short treatment courses, and possibly even with a single 1.5-g dose, despite the relatively slow growth of the organism (367,368). Overall, azithromycin and the investigational ketolide cethromycin (ABT-773) are the most potent drugs against M. pneumoniae in terms of MICs (436).…”
Section: Treatment Of Infections Due To M Pneumoniaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation appears to be analogous in many ways to that for genital infection with C. trachomatis; no one would even consider evaluating antimicrobial efficacy by serology. However, the only treatment studies of pneumonia caused by C. pneumoniae that have been published in journals so far have relied entirely on diagnosis by serology (1,37).…”
Section: Susceptibility Testing Of C Pneumoniaementioning
confidence: 99%