2014
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of three current sets of electrocardiographic interpretation criteria for use in screening athletes

Abstract: BackgroundAn increasing number of sporting bodies report unacceptably high levels of false-positive ECGs when undertaking pre-participation cardiac screening. To address this issue, modified ECG interpretation criteria have become available for use within athletes.ObjectiveThis study assessed the accuracy of the new 2014 ‘Refined Criteria’ against the 2013 Seattle Criteria and the 2010 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommendations in a cohort of Arabic, black and Caucasian athletes.Methods2491 male athl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
95
2
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
95
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…By using the Seattle criteria, we achieved a 2.5-fold reduction in the occurrence of pathological changes in comparison to ESC criteria, whereas Refined criteria gave a nearly four-fold reduction in comparison to the ESC criteria. Riding et al [22], in an extensive analysis (2.491 male athletes, different nationalities, different disciplines), obtained very similar results: ESC criteria vs. Seattle criteria revealed an almost 2-fold reduction, and ESC criteria vs. Refined criteria a 4-fold reduction in detection of abnormal changes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using the Seattle criteria, we achieved a 2.5-fold reduction in the occurrence of pathological changes in comparison to ESC criteria, whereas Refined criteria gave a nearly four-fold reduction in comparison to the ESC criteria. Riding et al [22], in an extensive analysis (2.491 male athletes, different nationalities, different disciplines), obtained very similar results: ESC criteria vs. Seattle criteria revealed an almost 2-fold reduction, and ESC criteria vs. Refined criteria a 4-fold reduction in detection of abnormal changes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Among the 11 patients (the 10% mentioned above), seven had a family history of HCM, and four presented a systolic cardiac murmur. Similarly, Riding et al [22] showed in his paper that heart auscultation helped to identify an additional 1.2% (n = 29) of athletes with valvular heart disease, who did not present pathological changes in ECG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of abnormal ECG readings have decreased with the use of each criteria: European Cardiology Society 22%, Seattle Criteria 11.6%, Refined Criteria 5.3%. 9 This demonstrates that Refined Criteria has had the most success in decreasing false positives in ECG interpretation by combining the most effective aspects of each criteria system and by standardizing interpretation techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…118 Various coding systems have been developed in efforts to optimize the utility of the ECG in this screening function. 119,120 Cost-effectiveness studies of screening in asymptomatic youth have been performed, with selected results presented below. (Table 2).…”
Section: Identification Of Young Patients At Risk For Scd Prodromal Smentioning
confidence: 99%