1989
DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/27.12.704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Thermodynamic Retention Behaviors on Various C18 Columns Different in Their Hydrophobicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The compensation temperatures which were deter-3076248C (95% confidence intervals) for oligomers mined from linear regression analysis of the entire 3-15 and 147668C for oligomers [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The fact curves for both polymers are 175688C for PS and that both values differ significantly, again indicate a 1206128C for PE.…”
Section: Hplc Equipment 33 Determination Of Phase Ratio and Ksec Vamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The compensation temperatures which were deter-3076248C (95% confidence intervals) for oligomers mined from linear regression analysis of the entire 3-15 and 147668C for oligomers [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. The fact curves for both polymers are 175688C for PS and that both values differ significantly, again indicate a 1206128C for PE.…”
Section: Hplc Equipment 33 Determination Of Phase Ratio and Ksec Vamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…r 0 0 d tography (RPLC) is to investigate the temperature dependence of isocratic retention [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. From the in which K is the chromatographic equilibrium In order to get a better understanding of their DS are the Gibbs free energy, standard enthalpy and retention behaviour, in this study the determination standard entropy of transfer of a solute from the and evaluation of thermodynamic parameters for mobile to the stationary phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are not always provided by the manufacturers and are often difficult to obtain. Sander and Field (39) proposed a f value of 0.384, and Yamamoto et al (44) reported ф values ranging between 0.351 and 0.819 for different C18 columns.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermodynamic relationship between the capacity factor (k') and temperature (T) was used to obtain solute transfer enthalpies and entropies and is as follows [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] :…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chromatographic enthalpies and entropies for the solute transfer from the mobile to the stationary phase can be obtained by measuring retention data over a wide range of temperature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and the specific solute functional group-mobile phase interaction can be derived from such thermodynamic data. [13][14][15][16][17] In our previous studies, we measured the specific hydroxyl group-solvent and carbonyl group-solvent interaction enthalpies and entropies of phenol and acetophenone in aqueous methanol mixtures using the squalane-impregnated C 18 stationary phase, 13 the specific functional group-solvent interaction enthalpies and entropies of phenol, benzylalcohol, phenenthylalcohol, acetophenone, and benzylacetone in aqueous acetonitrile mixtures using the squalane-impregnated C 18 stationary phase, 16 and the specific functional group-solvent interaction enthalpies and entropies of 4 positional isomers of phenylbutanol, 5-phenyl-1-pentanol, 3 positional isomers of alkylarylketone derived from butylbenzene, and 1-phenyl-2-hexanone in aqueous methanol mixtures using the Alltima C 18 stationary phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%