2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of thermodynamic and environmental indexes of natural gas, syngas and hydrogen production processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Other secondary systems were excluded because of data availability. It is recognized that such stages have negligible effects if distributed over their operational lifespan [26]. Different system configurations were modeled to check the sensitivity of the results.…”
Section: Hydrogen Production Technologies and Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other secondary systems were excluded because of data availability. It is recognized that such stages have negligible effects if distributed over their operational lifespan [26]. Different system configurations were modeled to check the sensitivity of the results.…”
Section: Hydrogen Production Technologies and Inventorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rosen [26] computed 78.5% efficiency of an SMR system which includes PSA, CO 2 sorption as purification unit after shift reactor and methanation. Bargigli et al [28] compared different hydrogen production pathways and reported exergy efficiency values of 43 up to 71%.…”
Section: Exergy Efficiency Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the traditional method for producing hydrogen or syngas from coal, i.e., using natural gas and biomass, is not energy-efficient because it requires heating the reactants to a relatively high temperature [1]. For example, in the Koppers-Totzek coal gasification process, pulverized coal is rapidly partially oxidized with oxygen and steam at essentially atmospheric pressure and at a temperature of 1750 K [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%