2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2009.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of thermal ionization mass spectrometry and Multiple Collector Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry for cesium isotope ratio measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This instrumental mass bias must be corrected for in order to achieve accurate and precise isotope ratio values. One cause of this are space charge effects, as lighter ions are deflected to a greater extent than heavier ions during ion extraction, leading to fractionation towards the heavier isotope relative to the true value [113]. …”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This instrumental mass bias must be corrected for in order to achieve accurate and precise isotope ratio values. One cause of this are space charge effects, as lighter ions are deflected to a greater extent than heavier ions during ion extraction, leading to fractionation towards the heavier isotope relative to the true value [113]. …”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isnard et al 316 have undertaken a comparison of TIMs and MC-ICP-MS for IRA of Cs. Results obtained by the two techniques showed good agreement, with only between 0.2% to 0.5% relative difference for 133 Cs : 137 Cs and 135 Cs : 137 Cs ratios for two nuclear samples.…”
Section: New Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A special case is the determination of the fission product Cs, since natural Cs is monoisotopic ( 133 Cs) and can therefore not be used as a reference material for mass bias correction. Other elements in the same mass range such as Ba (PSI approach) or Eu and Sb [43] have to be used for the external mass bias correction.…”
Section: Burn-up Determination By Hplc-mc-icp-msmentioning
confidence: 99%