The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of thermal damage of the internal thoracic artery using ultra high radiofrequency and monopolar diathermy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main possible disadvantage is thermal damage or opening of the pyloric mucosa, if the electrocautery hook is inserted too deep, or lateral thermal damage to surrounding organs [22,36]. Care should be taken to avoid thermal damage as it does not have to be seen immediately, and delayed complications develop [22,27,[36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main possible disadvantage is thermal damage or opening of the pyloric mucosa, if the electrocautery hook is inserted too deep, or lateral thermal damage to surrounding organs [22,36]. Care should be taken to avoid thermal damage as it does not have to be seen immediately, and delayed complications develop [22,27,[36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fukata et al investigated the histological effects of an ultrasonic scalpel on blood vessel walls and found that thermal damage was limited to the depth of the connective tissue of the tunica externa of the blood vessels ( 31 ). Bulat et al further investigated the effect of thermal damage on vascular endothelial cells using electrocautery and a high-frequency ultrasonic scalpel for harvesting IMAs, and reported that the degree of endothelial damage was 2.8 times greater in the electrocautery than in the high-frequency ultrasonic scalpel group ( 32 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, preparation of ITA grafts has evolved from the use of dissecting scissors and hemostatic clips, to conventional electrosurgery with continuous radiofrequency energy with different settings and output levels, to ultra-high radiofrequency “cold” knifes, and the use of ultrasonic devices [ 17 19 ]. Nevertheless, the established technique of using the conventional electrosurgical device at low output levels in many centers is still considered the standard procedure, which may be due to the generally low cost of the device, the non-superiority of other devices, further disadvantages of new devices and absent data concerning histological samples, long term outcomes results, or control groups [ 15 17 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%