2008
DOI: 10.21836/pem20080313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of therapeutic techniques for the treatment of cheek teeth diseases in the horse: Extraction versus repulsion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In retrospect, most infected teeth could probably have been repulsed in the standing horse. Similarly, Bienert et al (2008) found post extraction complications in 53% of repulsed vs. 18% of orally extracted cheek teeth.…”
Section: Dental Sinusitismentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In retrospect, most infected teeth could probably have been repulsed in the standing horse. Similarly, Bienert et al (2008) found post extraction complications in 53% of repulsed vs. 18% of orally extracted cheek teeth.…”
Section: Dental Sinusitismentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Oral extraction should always be the first method of choice, as several studies have proven the lowest complication rates for this approach ( 2 , 6 , 7 , 10 ). However, pre-existing or exodontia-related tooth fractures can make oral extraction impossible ( 11 ) and necessitate another extraction method such as minimally invasive lateral buccotomy, intraoral sectioning with a surgical bur or repulsion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral extraction of CT (Dixon 1997; Tremaine 1997, 2004; Dixon et al . 2005) is the technique of choice and should always be attempted prior to dental repulsion, as the complication rates are much lower with the former procedure (Bienert et al . 2008; Dixon et al .…”
Section: Dental Sinusitismentioning
confidence: 99%