2018
DOI: 10.3390/buildings8100146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Theoretical and Laboratory Out-of-Plane Shear Stiffness Values of Cross Laminated Timber Panels

Abstract: The lay-up of cross laminated timber (CLT) leads to significant differences in properties over its cross-section. Particularly the out-of-plane shear behavior of CLT is affected by the changes in shear moduli over the cross-section. Results from laboratory shear tests are used to evaluate the shear stiffness of 3- and 5-layer CLT panels in their major and minor strength direction. The results are compared to calculated shear stiffness values on evaluated single-layer properties as well as commonly used propert… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like the above-mentioned, a comparison between the Timoshenko theory and the SAM with respect to the experimental results obtained on 3-and 5-layer CLT panels is reported in Niederwestberg et al [18]. An advancement to the results is also provided by the modified γ-method and by a specific 2D numerical model-properly developed by the authors-have been compared in this paper, thus enlarging the field of available results in the scientific literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like the above-mentioned, a comparison between the Timoshenko theory and the SAM with respect to the experimental results obtained on 3-and 5-layer CLT panels is reported in Niederwestberg et al [18]. An advancement to the results is also provided by the modified γ-method and by a specific 2D numerical model-properly developed by the authors-have been compared in this paper, thus enlarging the field of available results in the scientific literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The latter two methods are based on a more accurate theory, but a greater computational effort is required for their applications. A comparison between Timoshenko theory and SAM with respect to the experimental results obtained on 3-and 5-layer CLT panels is reported in Niederwestberg et al [18]. Alternatively, a modification of γ-method-included in the current version of Eurocode 5 for calculating composite timber beams-has been proposed as suitable for accounting the rolling shear effect in CLT floor elements [19].…”
Section: Rolling Shear Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restrictions for the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory lose their validity and the Timoshenko beam theory needs to be applied, which is a common method for calculating wood constructions. [24,[29][30][31][32][33] According to the Timoshenko beam theory, the total displacement is the sum of bending and shear displacement [24] w total ¼ w bending þ w shear (1)…”
Section: Calculation Of the Component Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used shear form factor value is 6/5 proposed by Reissner [23] based on First order shear deformation theory (FSDT). Shear form factor value of 12/π 2 was proposed by Mindlin [24] and shear form factor was proposed to be a function of Poisson's ratio by Cowper [25].…”
Section: Shear Form Factormentioning
confidence: 99%