2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cap.2017.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of theoretical and experimental results for band-gap-graded CZTSSe solar cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The complete set of measured EQEs of the different devices is displayed in Figure S2, showing the gradual collection efficiency improvement. This specific behavior is recurrently reported when BSF layers are used regardless of the PV technology, such as in silicon solar cells by introducing boron‐based BSF, 11 in CIGS with the Ga‐gradient, 14 or even in kesterite theoretical studies have shown how the introduction of a p‐Si layer would efficiently act as BSF 42 . Intriguingly, also in Figure 3, the EQE measured under reverse bias voltage (−1 V) confirms a remarkable improvement in collection efficiency, likely related to lower recombination at the rear interface for the CuGa containing sample, which could be directly associated with the observed morphology improvement as well as the fact of having a passivating layer at the back side.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The complete set of measured EQEs of the different devices is displayed in Figure S2, showing the gradual collection efficiency improvement. This specific behavior is recurrently reported when BSF layers are used regardless of the PV technology, such as in silicon solar cells by introducing boron‐based BSF, 11 in CIGS with the Ga‐gradient, 14 or even in kesterite theoretical studies have shown how the introduction of a p‐Si layer would efficiently act as BSF 42 . Intriguingly, also in Figure 3, the EQE measured under reverse bias voltage (−1 V) confirms a remarkable improvement in collection efficiency, likely related to lower recombination at the rear interface for the CuGa containing sample, which could be directly associated with the observed morphology improvement as well as the fact of having a passivating layer at the back side.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Numerical simulations with SCAPS-1D yields good agreement between the simulation results and experimental data, and hence, it is a superior solar cell simulator. 39 The AC and DC PV parameters such as FF, Voc, PCE, and Jsc were simulated under light conditions and different working temperatures. The characteristic parameters of the simulated device are extracted from J-V curves, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an optimal MoSe 2 layer thickness is required since a very thick MoSe 2 limits the current collecting ability of the back electrode due to the high resistivity of MoSe 2 (10 1 -10 4 Ωcm) and hence deteriorating the electrical parameters [49] [50]. An optimization of the MoSe 2 layer thickness is therefore required to give it its role as an electron reflector.…”
Section: Mo/cigs Interface Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%