2020
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1679/4/042022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the YOLOv3 and Mask R-CNN architectures’ efficiency in the smart refrigerator’s computer vision

Abstract: The article deals with the computer vision system of the smart refrigerator “Robimarket”. The equipment of the working area of the refrigerator, the selection of a set of chambers, the collection of a training sample for the computer vision system are described. The choice of the artificial intelligence architecture of the computer vision system was made by comparative testing of the YOLOv3 and Mask R-CNN architectures. The comparison was made on one hardware platform, one training set and a set of test cases.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [28], Mask R-CNN architecture is compared with YOLOv3. The dataset contains 800 training and 70 test images It was found that the accuracy of Mask R-CNN is significantly higher compared to YOLOv3, but in terms of detection speed, YOLOv3 outperformed Mask R-CNN.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [28], Mask R-CNN architecture is compared with YOLOv3. The dataset contains 800 training and 70 test images It was found that the accuracy of Mask R-CNN is significantly higher compared to YOLOv3, but in terms of detection speed, YOLOv3 outperformed Mask R-CNN.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the increase in multiplicity reaches three percent, indicating that the category imbalance loss function can more effectively distinguish hard-to-discriminate targets. 7 that it has a higher detection accuracy compared with the common two-stage detection algorithms Faster R-CNN [12] and Mask R-CNN [13]. Compared with the one-stage detection algorithms YOLOv2 [14], YOLOv3 [15], and SSD [16] series, it highlights its own detection accuracy more.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysis Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our study in "III. PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED AND POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS" shows that for the existing state-of-the-art Tracking-by-Detection [15,[26][27][28] and Target tracking [44][45][46][47] methods available are either too low in precision and recall rate or too slow to be directly applied to the autonomous landing of fixed-wing UAVs. Therefore, we propose a deep learning based Vision Transformer Particle Region-based Convolutional Neural Network (VitP-RCNN).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study concluded that YOLOv3 has higher mAP and FPS than Faster RCNN and SSD. In Dorrer [28], Mask RCNN architecture was compared with YOLOv3. It was found that the accuracy of Mask RCNN is significantly higher compared to YOLOv3, but in terms of detection speed, YOLOv3 outperformed Mask RCNN.…”
Section: Trackingbydetection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%