2014
DOI: 10.3176/proc.2014.1.09
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the wear and frictional properties of Cu matrix composites prepared by pulsed electric current sintering

Abstract: Wear performance of Cu matrix composites prepared by pulsed electric current sintering (PECS) was evaluated by using non-lubricated sliding tests. The studied materials contained cuprite (Cu 2 O), alumina (Al 2 O 3 ), titaniumdiboride (TiB 2 ) or diamond dispersoids in a coarse-grained Cu (c-Cu), submicron-grained Cu (sm-Cu), or nano-grained Cu (nCu) matrix. PECS compacted matrix materials were used as references. The ball-on-flat tests showed strong dependence of the coefficient of friction (CoF), wear rate a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(78 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“….% G1-50 wt.% G2 compositions, by applying the 10 N loads, was recorded. But it has not effect on COF values significantly perhaps in G1-G2 composite due to different roughness the resulted composite did not show the improved COF value [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“….% G1-50 wt.% G2 compositions, by applying the 10 N loads, was recorded. But it has not effect on COF values significantly perhaps in G1-G2 composite due to different roughness the resulted composite did not show the improved COF value [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, probably, the compressive stress extent on the surface of coats has not effect on COF values significantly (G2 and G1) moreover in the case of G1-G2 composite (Fig. 10c) perhaps due to the two different roughness the resulted composite did not show the improved COF value (unlike the wear rate) [26].…”
Section: Wear Behaviormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Inherently, harder reinforcement particles withstand the load and act as asperities and reduce the pin-counterface contact area, which result in the reduction of friction coefficient. 49,50
Figure 8.Average friction coefficient values of all specimens at three different applied loads of 10, 20, and 30 N and sliding speed of 0.7 m/s.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inherently, harder reinforcement particles withstand the load and act as asperities and reduce the pin-counterface contact area, which result in the reduction of friction coefficient. 49,50 FESEM morphologies of the worn out surface is provided in Figure 9, which gives a clear statement of wear that took place in each samples. From Figure 9(a), FESEM morphology gives a clear cut view on the cutting action undergone by the soft copper material due to plastic deformation and wear.…”
Section: Ctementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its particular outer cell electron structure, the application of rare earth is exposed to many research fields such as optics, tribology [7,8], etc. Rare earth oxides are considered to be the ideal sintering addictive because of their high melting points, chemical stability, excellent mechanical, thermal, optical, and electrical properties [9,10]. La 2 O 3 has a unique electronic structure because that was successfully added into the metal to improve the toughness, strength, and tribological properties [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%