Comparison of the value of superficial mark guided localization and hook‐wire guided localization techniques for non‐palpable breast microcalcifications: A retrospective clinical research

Abstract

Aim The present study compares the effect and accuracy of the superficial mark guided localization (SGL) and hook‐wire guided localization (WGL) techniques for non‐palpable breast microcalcifications. Methods This retrospective study was conducted to compare SGL and WGL techniques. These techniques were performed on 51 patients with non‐palpable breast microcalcifications from January 2015 to May 2016. Results Among these 51 patients, 25 (49.01%) patients were subjected to WGL and 26 patients (50.99%) were subjected to SGL. The SGL technique had a higher rate of malignant cancer detection (WGL = 12.0% and SGL = 23.0%). Furthermore, no significant differences were found with regard to average age, the rate of a second excision and the diameter of the excised tissue. Moreover, no complications were observed in the SGL group, while four (16.0%) patients in the WGL group experienced problems. Conclusion The SGL technique is as accurate as the WGL technique. Furthermore, the procedure has advantages of being less expensive and causing less complications.

CT-guided placement of microcoil end in the pleural cavity for video-assisted thoracic surgical resection of ground-glass opacity: a retrospective study

“…Solid materials include hook wires [ 27 ], microcoils [ 28 ], and other materials. Hook-wire was special for breast nodule positioning [ 29 ] because there was no special instrument for lung nodule positioning before in the world, hook-wire was used for lung nodule positioning. Moreover, the hook-wire was quite hard, which increased the risk of pneumothorax, intrapulmonary hemorrhage, and chest pain.…”