2015
DOI: 10.1177/1403494815621641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the validity of stroke diagnoses in a medical quality register and an administrative health register

Abstract: The Norwegian Stroke Register and the Norwegian Patient Register are adequately complete and correct to serve as valuable sources of data for epidemiological, clinical and healthcare studies, as well as for administrative purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
70
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(14 reference statements)
3
70
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent Norwegian study reported a PPV of 79.7% for hospital admissions with a main or secondary diagnosis of acute stroke (ICD-10: I61, I63, and I64) when compared with adjudication of medical records; 65% of the false-positives were defined as previous strokes, rehabilitations after stroke or old strokes not previously diagnosed 25. In the past, however, patients with ischaemic stroke were not consistently admitted to hospitals for exact diagnosis and specific treatment, although this practice has become more standard in the past decade 26.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent Norwegian study reported a PPV of 79.7% for hospital admissions with a main or secondary diagnosis of acute stroke (ICD-10: I61, I63, and I64) when compared with adjudication of medical records; 65% of the false-positives were defined as previous strokes, rehabilitations after stroke or old strokes not previously diagnosed 25. In the past, however, patients with ischaemic stroke were not consistently admitted to hospitals for exact diagnosis and specific treatment, although this practice has become more standard in the past decade 26.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concordance is high for illnesses such as cancer and stroke (Bakken et al, 2012;Varmdal et al, 2016), with excellent specificity due to few false positives, but has only moderate sensitivity as an indicator of psychiatric illnesses, such as anxiety and major depression (Torvik et al, 2018). Concordance is high for illnesses such as cancer and stroke (Bakken et al, 2012;Varmdal et al, 2016), with excellent specificity due to few false positives, but has only moderate sensitivity as an indicator of psychiatric illnesses, such as anxiety and major depression (Torvik et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The registry contains specialist-determined diagnoses, yet the diagnostic validity of the register for the purpose of epidemiological research for EDs has not been specifically tested or cross-checked with direct clinical examinations or other registries. Concordance is high for illnesses such as cancer and stroke (Bakken et al, 2012;Varmdal et al, 2016), with excellent specificity due to few false positives, but has only moderate sensitivity as an indicator of psychiatric illnesses, such as anxiety and major depression (Torvik et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All discharge diagnoses are exclusively assigned by the physicians treating the patient, and cannot later be altered. The registry receives data monthly and is used for reimbursement purposes, hospital activity statistics, and research (Varmdal et al, ). Coding of ICH discharge diagnoses in the NPR is of high quality, with positive predictive values for ICH hospital admissions exceeding 95% (Oie et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%