2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2016.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the TOF-Scan™ acceleromyograph to TOF-Watch SX™: Influence of calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study comprised the second phase of the initial study that compared the TS accelerometer to the TOF Watch accelerometer, and was conducted from January to October 2018 [8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study comprised the second phase of the initial study that compared the TS accelerometer to the TOF Watch accelerometer, and was conducted from January to October 2018 [8].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We previously compared the TOFscan (TS) accelerometer to the TOF Watch accelerometer [8]. The TS seemed to have some advantages, including the absence of the need for calibration without affecting the recovery results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work suggested poor agreement between the two devices at deep block levels, and better agreement during recovery. 11 From a scientific standpoint, the two monitors are not interchangeable: the mean baseline train-of-four ratios were significantly higher when measured with the TOF-Watch (110.0 ± 5%) than TOFscan (100.0 ± 1%); and, despite starting from a higher train-of-four baseline, the time to complete block (defined as train-of-four count of 0) was more than 1 min faster when measured with the TOF-Watch. Practically, however, the bias between the two monitors was minimal, the limits of agreement were narrow, and the train-of-four ratios at extubation were clinically similar.…”
Section: Given the Documented Struggles Anesthesiologists Have Gettinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, many of these emerging technologies have emphasized the ease of use to increase the acceptance and popularity of the devices. While validation studies are still in progress, early reports investigating new monitors have been very promising [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67]. It appears that the anesthesia community will have multiple options to select from when adopting quantitative monitoring.…”
Section: The Introduction Of Objective Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%