2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-019-04333-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Thermal Behaviour of the Asphaltic Concrete Facing Protected by the Reflective Surface and Reinforced Concrete, Case of the Bouhnifia Dam, Northwest Algeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along with the measured room temperature, convection (convection coefficient 4 W/m 2 K) was considered on the top surface (emissivity or radiation does not affect the top cold surface). The bottom surface was subjected to heat; hence, both convection (convection coefficient 25 W/m 2 K) and radiation (0.8 assumed from the literature) were considered (Chebbah et al , 2020). The highest temperature observed on the slab bottom surface from the adiabatic experiment was considered as the boundary condition in Kelvin.…”
Section: Validation Analysis In Ansysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the measured room temperature, convection (convection coefficient 4 W/m 2 K) was considered on the top surface (emissivity or radiation does not affect the top cold surface). The bottom surface was subjected to heat; hence, both convection (convection coefficient 25 W/m 2 K) and radiation (0.8 assumed from the literature) were considered (Chebbah et al , 2020). The highest temperature observed on the slab bottom surface from the adiabatic experiment was considered as the boundary condition in Kelvin.…”
Section: Validation Analysis In Ansysmentioning
confidence: 99%