1996
DOI: 10.1021/jp953508a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the 129Xe NMR Chemical Shift with Simulation in Zeolite Y

Abstract: We report quantitative agreement between Monte Carlo simulation and the experimental NMR chemical shift of 129 Xe adsorbed in the supercages of zeolite Y. This agreement supports previous assertions, originating from Ripmeester and Fraissard, that the Xe shift can in principle provide a sensitive measure of the structure imposed on Xe by the three-dimensional potential field provided by the crystal structure of the zeolite. Up to a loading of 7 Xe/cage at 300 K, we verify that the linear rise of shift with loa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(144 reference statements)
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…
15 Average 129 Xe chemical shifts at 300 K from the GCMC simulations of Xe (□) in NaX (Si/Al = 1.18), and (○) in NaY (Si/Al = 3.00) are compared. These simulations are compared with experimental data (•) in NaX (Si/Al = 1.23) at 293 K from Liu, (·) in NaY (Si/Al = 2.49) at 293 K from Liu, (▴) in NaY (Si/Al = 2.4) at 298 K from Boddenberg et al, and (×) in NaY (Si/Al = 160) at 300 K from Gupta et al Also shown are (+) the experimental data in NaY at various Si/Al ratios ranging from 1.28 to 54.2, at 298 K from Ito et al
…”
Section: Gcmc Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…
15 Average 129 Xe chemical shifts at 300 K from the GCMC simulations of Xe (□) in NaX (Si/Al = 1.18), and (○) in NaY (Si/Al = 3.00) are compared. These simulations are compared with experimental data (•) in NaX (Si/Al = 1.23) at 293 K from Liu, (·) in NaY (Si/Al = 2.49) at 293 K from Liu, (▴) in NaY (Si/Al = 2.4) at 298 K from Boddenberg et al, and (×) in NaY (Si/Al = 160) at 300 K from Gupta et al Also shown are (+) the experimental data in NaY at various Si/Al ratios ranging from 1.28 to 54.2, at 298 K from Ito et al
…”
Section: Gcmc Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Pellenq and Nicholson's PN1 potential yielded k H = 3.74 × 10 -2 and 2.90 × 10 -4 mmol/(g Pa) at 195 and 273 K, respectively, whereas our GCMC simulations using parameter set II in the present work, lead to 3.66 × 10 -2 and 2.44 × 10 -4 mmol/(g Pa) at 195 and 273 K, respectively, in good agreement with the results of Pellenq and Nicholson. GCMC simulations have been carried out independently by McCormick and his group for Xe in NaY using a chemical shift that has been parametrized to agree with experiment . In our work, on the other hand, we have used the same chemical shift functions, based on ab initio calculations, for Xe−O, Xe−Na, and Xe−Xe interactions as we have used from the beginning, to interpret the observations for Xe in NaA, Xe + Ar in NaA, Xe + Kr in NaA, Xe in Ca x Na 12 - 2 x A, and in the present work.…”
Section: Gcmc Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jameson et al ,,, used grand canonical Monte Carlo simulations and ab initio calculations (justifiably using argon as a model inert gas atom) to study the effect of loading and temperature on the chemical shift of Xe in NaA and found quantitative agreement with the experimental data. In a similar spirit, we recently reported quantitative agreement between Monte Carlo simulation and experiment when the NMR chemical shift of 129 Xe in zeolite Y is modeled by a Drude model …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Fraissard and Ito postulate that δ Xe-Xe is a constant, implying that the shift is linear in loading. In a previous work, we showed for zeolite Y that the implication, that the Xe−Xe pair correlations are constant with loading, is true at low loadings. However, at high loadings, the pair correlation function changes, and the shift can become nonlinear with loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation