1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf00254212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the structure of ribosomal 5S RNA from E. coli and from rat liver using X-ray scattering and dynamic light scattering

Abstract: The structure of eukaryotic ribosomal 5S RNA from rat liver and of prokaryotic 5S RNA from E. coli (A-conformer) have been investigated by scattering methods. For both molecules, a molar mass of 44,500 +/- 4,000 was determined from small angle X-ray scattering as well as from dynamic light scattering. The shape parameters of the two rRNAs, volume Vc, surface Oc, radius of gyration Rs, maximum dimension of the molecule L, thickness D, and cross section radius of gyration Rsq, agree within the experimental error… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…35 In these conditions as a result of electrostatic interactions the diffusion coefficient value extrapolated to the zero concentration is charged with a relatively great error (due to the strong dependence of D T on polymer concentration usually observed at low ionic strength), nevertheless the value obtained by Müller in the limit of error is comparable with that obtained by us (Table I).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…35 In these conditions as a result of electrostatic interactions the diffusion coefficient value extrapolated to the zero concentration is charged with a relatively great error (due to the strong dependence of D T on polymer concentration usually observed at low ionic strength), nevertheless the value obtained by Müller in the limit of error is comparable with that obtained by us (Table I).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The diffusion coefficients, D, and hydrodynamic radii, r h , were calculated from the determined diffusion times at saturation (Table 1). These values correspond to the theoretically calculated data and are comparable to experimental data using other RNA molecules, e.g., 5S rRNA (120 nt) with D ¼ 5.9 Â 10 À11 m 2 /s and r h ¼ 3.6 Â 10 À9 m (24).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As observed, the results coming from our BD simulations agree relatively well with both experimental data and rigid body hydrodynamic predictions. In particular, our predictions for D t and R g are coincident with some of the experimental measurements collected in Table 2 [ 48 , 49 ]. If we use our predicted D t value (6.2×10 −7 cm 2 /s) and the Svedberg equation ( ), we obtain a value for the sedimentation coefficient s ≃5 S what further supports the validity of the scheme employed in this work.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%