2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.01.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the structural stability of pasture and cultivated soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Palmer-Felgate et al (2009) determined that higher risk agricultural practices (intensive arable production and dairy and beef production) can lead either directly, or indirectly through increased inputs of fine sediment, to increased sediment P concentrations. Among pasture and croplands, Barral et al (2007) found that pasture soil presents a higher mean aggregate diameter and aggregate stability against mechanical agitation in water, as well as lower soil loss under simulated rainfall, so its contribution to the sediments may be similar to the contribution of cropped soils, in spite of the higher concentrations of the former.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Total Phosphorus Concentrations In the Soil Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palmer-Felgate et al (2009) determined that higher risk agricultural practices (intensive arable production and dairy and beef production) can lead either directly, or indirectly through increased inputs of fine sediment, to increased sediment P concentrations. Among pasture and croplands, Barral et al (2007) found that pasture soil presents a higher mean aggregate diameter and aggregate stability against mechanical agitation in water, as well as lower soil loss under simulated rainfall, so its contribution to the sediments may be similar to the contribution of cropped soils, in spite of the higher concentrations of the former.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Total Phosphorus Concentrations In the Soil Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in vegetation cover increases the source of soil organic matter, this being the main bonding material forming soil aggregate structure (Yu et al, 2017). Therefore, the cohesive effect of soil particles with an anchor frame beam is stronger than rimless slope, and more stable aggregates can be formed (Barral et al, 2007). Our results…”
Section: Soil Aggregate Stability and Soil Aggregate Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Analysis of soil structural characteristics from the number, spatial distribution, fractal dimension (D m ) of PSD, water movement features, and soil aggregate stability have been previously undertaken (Asano & Wagai, 2014;Baveye, 2006;Pagliai, Vignozzi, & Pellegrini, 2004;Young & Crawford, 2004;Young, Crawford, & Rappoldt, 2001). As soil bulk density, porosity, moisture, organic matter content can also affect the soil nutrients, water cycle, formation, and stability of soil aggregates, affecting the growth status of plants, these factors therefore have a significant influence on chemical and biological processes, and they are important indices for evaluating soil quality (Barral, Bujan, Devesa, Iglesias, & Velasco-Molina, 2007;Dexter, 2004;Hayashi, Ken'ichirou, & Mizuyama, 2006;Kaisermann, Maron, Beaumelle, & Lata, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to stump removal, the long-term effect of disking nine times in the first 3 years after planting likely contributed to the increased bulk density in the upper 10 cm of Depth ( soil. When soils are cultivated year after year, they become more dense than similar soils that remain as undisturbed prairie (Mudgal et al 2010) or pasture land (Barral et al 2007). It is notable that these effects could persist for 49 years in the present study.…”
Section: Bulk Densitymentioning
confidence: 64%