2019
DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2019.1653783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the stabilising effects of government spending shocks in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland

Abstract: This study examines the effects of government spending shocks in three Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries: the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. The article uses structural vector autoregression (SVAR) models with an identification scheme based on that of Blanchard and Perotti (2002). The results of government spending shocks in these countries are consistent with the general view that the spending innovation increases output in the short term. The impulse response functions show that the maximum r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of Poland, Czechia and Hungary, empirical evidence mostly finds relatively low values for fiscal multipliers, usually between 0 and 1. Szymanska ( 2019 ) estimated the 1-year cumulative spending multipliers for Czechia and Hungary at 0.4 and, respectively, 0.5. As regards Poland, empirical evidence showed a higher than 1 expenditure revenue, also confirmed by Derkacz ( 2020 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of Poland, Czechia and Hungary, empirical evidence mostly finds relatively low values for fiscal multipliers, usually between 0 and 1. Szymanska ( 2019 ) estimated the 1-year cumulative spending multipliers for Czechia and Hungary at 0.4 and, respectively, 0.5. As regards Poland, empirical evidence showed a higher than 1 expenditure revenue, also confirmed by Derkacz ( 2020 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tabel 1. Artikel peer-review dalam database literatur dalam penelitian Zakat, Belanja Pemerintah, Utang Pemerintah, dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Indonesia Variabel Referensi Zakat (Al-Homaidi et al, 2020;Aziz et al, 2020;Bouanani & Belhadj, 2020;Gassebner et al, 2023;Ghlamallah et al, 2021;Loewenthal et al, 2021;Maham & Bhatti, 2019;Moeis et al, 2022;Sudarsono et al, 2022;Syakir et al, 2021) Belanja (Babatunde, 2018;Choi & Kim, Pemerintah 2021;Combes et al, 2021;Islam et al, 2021;Jalles, 2021;Kormilitsina & Zubairy, 2018;Luintel et al, 2020;Montes et al, 2019;Szymańska, 2019;Troug, 2020) Utang Pemerintah (Ahmed et al, 2022;Ang et al, 2018;Hosono et al, 2023;Jennes, 2021;Kasal, 2023;Q. Liu & Bai, 2022;Y.…”
Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasan 31 Hasil Penelitianunclassified