Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Silorane-Based Composite Resin and Methacrylate Based Composite Resin to MTA

Serin, Buse Ayse; Dogan, Muharrem Cem; Yoldaş, Hamdi

doi:10.15171/joddd.2018.001

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 37 publications

(16 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Shear bond strength is the most commonly used technique to gauge bond strength and is used in approximately 30% of scientific papers worked on bond strength [ 22 ]. It is a simple, quick, and reliable method [ 23 ]. No further processing on the specimens is required after the bonding procedure [ 24 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Bioinductive Cavity Liners on Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composite to Dentin

Tohidkhah

Ahmadi

Abbasi

et al. 2022

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The aim of the current study was to evaluate and compare the influence of Dycal, Lime-Lite, TheraCal LC, Biodentine, resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), and Activa BioActive as the pulp capping material on the shear bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Methods. A total of 70 extracted caries-free molars were randomly assigned to seven groups. Six test groups were covered with various protective liners: Dycal, TheraCal LC, Lime-Lite, Activa BioActive, Biodentine, and RMGIC. The control group received no liner pretreatment. Each sample was bonded to resin composite using the total-etch Tetric N bond adhesive. The samples were then tested for shear bond strength using the universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min until bond failure occurred. The data were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test followed by the Tamhane post hoc test for pairwise comparisons of the groups. Results. Independent of the type of the applied liner, all groups exhibited inferior SBS to dentin compared to the control group. TheraCal and RMGIC showed significantly higher shear bond strength than Biodentine and Dycal, which showed the lowest shear bond strength. Lime-Lite and Activa also had significantly lower SBS results than TheraCal. The mode of fracture was predominantly cohesive in Dycal, Biodentine, and TheraCal and adhesive in Activa. Conclusion. This present study concludes that the bond strength of resin composite to dentin can be affected differently using various types of liners.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Bioinductive Cavity Liners on Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composite to Dentin

Tohidkhah

Ahmadi

Abbasi

et al. 2022

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The most important parameter in the formation of microleakage is polymerization shrinkage. Therefore the bonding strength of adhesives to dentine must be able to withstand the tension of polymerization shrinkage [28][29][30][31] . The elasticity module, shrinkage and thermal expansion coefficients of composite resins are the determining factors for preventing microleakage [32][33][34] .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

In Vitro Evaluation of Bond Strength to Primary Molar Dentine and Microleakage Properties of Low Polymerization Shrinkage Silorane Based Composite Resin

Serin¹,

Yazıcıoğlu²,

Dogan³

2020

JSTR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the microleakage properties and shear bond strength to primary and permanent molar dentine of the low polymerization shrinkage silorane based composite resin and to compare the results with a methacrylate based composite resin. Materials and Methods: Shear bond strength test method was selected to evaluate the bond strength of the groups. Buccal dentine surfaces of primary and permanent molar teeth were used. The surfaces of the broken samples were detected under stereomicroscope and were grouped as adhesive, cohesive and mix. Dye penetration method was selected for the microleakage test. Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of primary and permanent molar teeth. Dye penetration levels were recorded in accordance with determined scores.Results: Silorane based composite resin was showed lower shear bond strength for primary and permanent molar dentine (p< 0.05). It was observed that most of the failures occurred in silorane based composite resin group, were adhesive type failures. According to the microleakage evaluation, primary molars were restored with silorane based composite resin were showed least microleakage (p< 0.05). Conclusion: The results of the laboratory tests should not be seen as the conclusion of the evaluated material but can be considered as preliminary information about the clinical performance of the material.

show abstract

“…4 Despite the increasing use of MTA, there is not enough information about which material to use on MTA and the bond strength between MTA and the restorative materials is an issue of concern. 5 Indeed, it has been stated that the coronal sealing is of great importance for successful endodontic treatment. 6 Recently, several restorative materials are available in the dental market, from amalgam to tooth colored esthetic options, each with its own positive and negative features.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Micro shear bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate to different innovative dental restorative materials

Durmazpınar

Recen

Çeliksöz

et al. 2023

Proc Inst Mech Eng H

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this in vitro study was to investigate the micro shear bond strength (µSBS) of mineral trioxide aggregate to four different restorative materials. Sixty mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) samples were randomly assigned into four experimental groups based on the restorative materials used: nanohybrid resin composite as a control, giomer, alkasite and ormocer. µSBS samples were prepared for each group ( n = 15). These samples were then submitted to a µSBS test (crosshead speed, 0.5 mm/min). The resulting data were statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Levene, and Bonferroni tests (α = 0.05). The bond strength of the alkasite group was statistically significantly higher than all the tested groups ( p<0.05), while there were no significant differences between the nanohybrid resin composite, giomer, or ormocer groups ( p > 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, alkasite restorative material could be a promising material when placed over MTA.

show abstract

Comparison of the Shear Bond Strength of Silorane-Based Composite Resin and Methacrylate Based Composite Resin to MTA

Cited by 9 publications

References 37 publications

Effect of Bioinductive Cavity Liners on Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composite to Dentin

Effect of Bioinductive Cavity Liners on Shear Bond Strength of Dental Composite to Dentin

In Vitro Evaluation of Bond Strength to Primary Molar Dentine and Microleakage Properties of Low Polymerization Shrinkage Silorane Based Composite Resin

Micro shear bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate to different innovative dental restorative materials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About