2000
DOI: 10.1029/1999jb900384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the rupture and radiation characteristics of intermediate and deep earthquakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
26
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we use V r = 0.6 V s (the average from Frohlich []) the stress drop will increased by a factor of 10, with a consequent reduction of the efficiency. Despite that, and assuming that k is constant as a function of moment, the observed scaling is robust, and it is in agreement with previous studies of deep and intermediate‐depth earthquakes [e.g., Campus and Das , ; Poli and Prieto , ]. We further neglect the directivity effect, which can be size‐dependent (e.g., unilateral rupture for big earthquakes), and thus playing a role on the observed scaling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…If we use V r = 0.6 V s (the average from Frohlich []) the stress drop will increased by a factor of 10, with a consequent reduction of the efficiency. Despite that, and assuming that k is constant as a function of moment, the observed scaling is robust, and it is in agreement with previous studies of deep and intermediate‐depth earthquakes [e.g., Campus and Das , ; Poli and Prieto , ]. We further neglect the directivity effect, which can be size‐dependent (e.g., unilateral rupture for big earthquakes), and thus playing a role on the observed scaling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…[]. The source scaling, depth dependence, and spatial variations of source duration of these earthquakes are studied at both global and regional scales and compared with previous studies [ Houston et al ., ; Persh and Houston , ; Tocheport et al ., ; Campus and Das , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Rupture duration is generally found to be proportional to the cube root of seismic moment, M o [ Kanamori and Anderson , 1975; Houston et al , 1998; Campus and Das , 2000]. Each duration estimate is divided by the cube root of the estimated earthquake M o from the Harvard CMT catalog, normalized to a moment magnitude ( M w ) 6.0 event.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%