2007
DOI: 10.2172/925334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the results of short-term static tests and single-pass flow-through tests with LRM glass.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that these fits should only be considered estimates because (many of) the curves, as shown in Figures and a, showed some evidence of nonlinear release, and none of the fits were constrained to pass through (0,0). These limitations with fitting of NL data with a single rate have been well-reported in previous studies. , All of the aluminoborate glasses showed convincing evidence of incongruent dissolution, with aluminum showing disproportionately lower extraction into the aqueous solutions (Figure b), and correspondingly slower extraction rates compared to that of Na or B (Figure a).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is noteworthy that these fits should only be considered estimates because (many of) the curves, as shown in Figures and a, showed some evidence of nonlinear release, and none of the fits were constrained to pass through (0,0). These limitations with fitting of NL data with a single rate have been well-reported in previous studies. , All of the aluminoborate glasses showed convincing evidence of incongruent dissolution, with aluminum showing disproportionately lower extraction into the aqueous solutions (Figure b), and correspondingly slower extraction rates compared to that of Na or B (Figure a).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…These limitations with fitting of NL data with a single rate have been well-reported in previous studies. 82,83 All of the aluminoborate glasses showed convincing evidence of incongruent dissolution, with aluminum showing disproportionately lower extraction into the aqueous solutions (Figure 6b), and correspondingly slower extraction rates compared to that of Na or B (Figure 7a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…have been carefully controlled and held constant. Interestingly, it is observed that the degradation rates of borosilicate glasses are higher in Tris-HNO 3 solutions, as compared to Tris-HCl solutions, which is contrary to the results reported by Tournié et al While these kinetic changes are statistically significant based upon the current error analysis, it is uncertain whether Tris-HCl versus Tris-HNO 3 rates are appreciably different, given the 15–25% systematic errors typically associated with the dissolution experiments and the approximation involved in fitting NL data with a single rate. , Accordingly, manybut not allof the rate differences reported in Tris-HCl versus Tris-HNO 3 for the current compositions are within the usually attributed errors in dissolution experiments. Furthermore, a close agreement is observed for the NL values within the residual rate regime.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…The specific surface areas for the -100 +200 mesh size fractions are 0.0196 m 2 /g for ARM-1 glass (density = 2.75 g cm -3 ) and for SRM 623 (density = 2.24 g cm -3 ); these were calculated by modeling the particles as spheres with diameters equal to the average sieve opening. The solution volume VW (in cm 3 ) was calculated from the mass of water used in the test and a density of 1.00 g cm -3 . The glass surface area-to-solution volume (S/V) ratio is a characteristic test parameter that varies in PCT-A conducted with glasses having different densities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The PCT procedure recommends calculating the glass surface area available in the test by representing the particles as a simple geometric shape having one dimension equal to the arithmetic average of the sieve openings, such as the diameter of a spherical particle or edge of a cubic particle. The accuracy of that approach has been verified by comparing the kinetic reaction rates of monolithic samples of known area with that measured for crushed and sized glass [2,3]. The consistency of PCT responses is strongly affected by the consistency of the surface area that is availible for the glass samples used in each test; that depends on a consistent distribution of particle sizes in the prepared glass and the absence of fines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%