2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Reperfusion Efficacy of Thrombus Aspiration With and Without Distal Protection During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This procedural strategy was adopted because past studies [ 5 , 6 ] have indicated that, when compared with standard balloon predilatation, routine thrombus aspiration for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) does not reduce prestent thrombus burden and fails to improve longer-term clinical outcomes while, in terms of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and myocardial blush grade (MBG), another study [ 7 ] demonstrated that thrombus aspiration with distal protection was superior when compared with aspiration alone. Although these studies [ 5 7 ] related to STEMI, the combination of these evidences clearly indicated that even after aspiration the risk of a significant amount of residual embolic material remaining meant using the best available protection procedures to prevent such embolic complications. Attempts were made to check for any previous reports addressing the efficacy of using an aspiration procedure in patients with stable coronary artery disease but none were found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedural strategy was adopted because past studies [ 5 , 6 ] have indicated that, when compared with standard balloon predilatation, routine thrombus aspiration for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) does not reduce prestent thrombus burden and fails to improve longer-term clinical outcomes while, in terms of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade and myocardial blush grade (MBG), another study [ 7 ] demonstrated that thrombus aspiration with distal protection was superior when compared with aspiration alone. Although these studies [ 5 7 ] related to STEMI, the combination of these evidences clearly indicated that even after aspiration the risk of a significant amount of residual embolic material remaining meant using the best available protection procedures to prevent such embolic complications. Attempts were made to check for any previous reports addressing the efficacy of using an aspiration procedure in patients with stable coronary artery disease but none were found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these patients, preventive modalities should be initiated before pPCI. Although the efficacies of embolic protection and mechanical thrombectomy devices [29,30] are vague, other preventive measures aimed at improving myocardial reperfusion at the microvascular level may be initiated prospectively and prove beneficial. Administration of a glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibitor, an intracoronary thrombolytic agent, or a high-dose adenosine infusion before pPCI was shown to be beneficial in some studies [31][32][33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%