2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-11881-5_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Relevance and the Performance of Filling in Gaps Methods in Climate Datasets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method assumes that the influence of the tracer variable decreases with distance from the sampled location [11] [12]. Inverse distance interpolation (IDW) is a good imputation method because it takes into consideration the weight of the stations [13]. The equation would be as: (6) P 0 is the estimated value of the missing data.…”
Section: The Inverse Distance Weighting (Idw)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method assumes that the influence of the tracer variable decreases with distance from the sampled location [11] [12]. Inverse distance interpolation (IDW) is a good imputation method because it takes into consideration the weight of the stations [13]. The equation would be as: (6) P 0 is the estimated value of the missing data.…”
Section: The Inverse Distance Weighting (Idw)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three stations were taken into account for the analysis. Before the trend analysis the data were subjected to missing data treatment in previous studies [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, [19,20] prioritized inverse distance weighting (IDW) over other spatial interpolation techniques. Outperformance was also reported for the normal ratio method (NRM) [16,21,22], correlation coefficient weighing (CCW) [23], and multiple linear regression (MLR) [24]. Nevertheless, Longman et al [25] specified no statistical differences (similar performance) between five spatial interpolation techniques (normal ratio method, linear regression, inverse distance weighting, quantile mapping, and single best estimator) for large gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%