1967
DOI: 10.1161/01.res.20.2.214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the Reflexes Elicited from Combined or Separate Stimulation of the Aortic and Carotid Chemoreceptors on Myocardial Contractility, Cardiac Output and Systemic Resistance

Abstract: Changes in left ventricular performance, stroke volume, and peripheral vascular resistance were studied in dogs after combined and separate stimulation of the aortic and carotid chemoreceptors. Selective stimulation of the aortic chemoreceptors produced an immediate increase in myocardial contractility as judged by the force developed by a strain gauge arch sewn into the left ventricular myocardium and by changes in the first derivative of the left ventricular pressure. Similar results were seen when heart rat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other reports can be criticized because the area stimulated was not well localized. Stern & Rapaport (1967) used the technique of injecting nictoine into the brachiocephalic artery and failed to obtain any responses of left ventricular contractile force as recorded using a strain gauge sutured to the myocardium. Pace (1970) however, reported a small decrease in right ventricular contractile force when nicotine was injected into the brachiocephalic artery of the dog.…”
Section: Effect Of Crushing the Carotid Bodies On The Inotropic Respomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other reports can be criticized because the area stimulated was not well localized. Stern & Rapaport (1967) used the technique of injecting nictoine into the brachiocephalic artery and failed to obtain any responses of left ventricular contractile force as recorded using a strain gauge sutured to the myocardium. Pace (1970) however, reported a small decrease in right ventricular contractile force when nicotine was injected into the brachiocephalic artery of the dog.…”
Section: Effect Of Crushing the Carotid Bodies On The Inotropic Respomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of previous studies are conflicting, probably as a result of inadequate localization of the stimulus (e.g. Salem, Penna & Aviado, 1964;Stern & Rapaport, 1967;Pace, 1970) or inadequate control of variables such as heart rate and aortic blood pressure which secondarily influence the inotropic state of the heart (e.g. Kahler, Goldblatt & Braunwald, 1962).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unlikely that significant chemoreceptor effects occurred since we have previously measured arterial blood gases and found no significant change in Po., Pco2, and pH with CSNS (21). Furthermore, chemoreceptor stimulation is considered to cause no change (31) or to decrease myocardial contractility (32), and therefore could not have masked the observed response. The slight bradycardia that occurred with CSNS after alpha blockade should not significantly affect the results, and furthermore, bradycardia is thought to diminish myocardial contractility (33)(34)(35).…”
Section: Bilateral Carotid Artery Occlusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Ehrhart et al (10) found a slight increase in left ventricular (LV)l dPldt and slight decrease in LV contractile force, whereas Stern and Rapaport (11) indicated that the aortic chemoreceptor reflex induced positive inotropic effects but the carotid chemoreceptor reflex induced no inotropic effect. It must be pointed out that all of these studies (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11) have been performed in anesthetized animal preparations, where the unknown mitigating effects of the anesthetic and general surgery play an undetermined role in the interpretation of these data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%