2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.03.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the protective effect of self-emulsifying peptide drug delivery systems towards intestinal proteases and glutathione

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Belonging to the group of lipid-based formulations, SEDDS can help overcome the main reasons for low oral absorption of peptide drugs, namely enzymatic degradation by intestinal proteases, poor mucus permeating properties and low cellular uptake. For example, it has been already proven, that hydrolyzing enzymes such as pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and elastase are not soluble in the oily SEDDS droplets and that therapeutic peptides incorporated in SEDDS are therefore protected against enzymatic degradation [6]. Further,, SEDDS bear a slippery surface facilitating mucus permeation even for large molecules [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belonging to the group of lipid-based formulations, SEDDS can help overcome the main reasons for low oral absorption of peptide drugs, namely enzymatic degradation by intestinal proteases, poor mucus permeating properties and low cellular uptake. For example, it has been already proven, that hydrolyzing enzymes such as pepsin, trypsin, chymotrypsin and elastase are not soluble in the oily SEDDS droplets and that therapeutic peptides incorporated in SEDDS are therefore protected against enzymatic degradation [6]. Further,, SEDDS bear a slippery surface facilitating mucus permeation even for large molecules [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the advances in peptide and protein delivery, the oral delivery of GLP-1 analogues like exenatide is still an elusive goal being limited by mainly the enzymatic barrier, mucus barrier and low membrane permeability. In this study, exenatide was incorporated in lipid-based NCs since it has been proven in many previous studies that lipid-based NCs can overcome the above mentioned hurdles for oral peptide delivery [7,16,22]. Hydrophobic ion pairing was applied before incorporation in NCs to sufficiently reduce hydrophilicity of the peptide by masking its ionic substructures with bulky lipophilic counter-ions [17,21,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of a limited stability of HIPs in the GI tract, the incorporation of HIPs into lipophilic carrier systems is advantageous [13][14][15]. In addition to a protective effect towards presystemic metabolism [16][17][18], lipid-based nanocarrier systems in particular proved to be able to facilitate mucus T permeation and to enhance the cellular uptake of peptides [19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beside the main use of SEDDS for the delivery of hydrophobic agents, recently, this system was explored as a carrier for orally administered hydrophilic macromolecules which are prone to intestinal enzymatic degradation. To be loaded into the oil phase, these hydrophilic agents are turned into hydrophobic agents through a technique known as the Hydrophobic Ionic Paring technique (HIP) [105]. This HIP technique includes the pairing of peptides with a macromolecular hydrophobic counter ion which turns the peptides into hydrophobic agents with high oil solubility.…”
Section: Sedds For Delivery Of Hydrophilic/lipophilic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%