2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.022
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the prevalence of chronic endometritis as determined by means of different diagnostic methods in women with and without reproductive failure

Abstract: ChiCTR-IOC-16007882.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
1
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
121
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between CE and infertility has recently emerged as an important clinical challenge. In fact, 2.8–56.8% of infertile women, 14–67.5% of women with RIF, and 9.3–67.6% of women with recurrent pregnancy loss are diagnosed with CE . Considering these high prevalence rates, CE is a condition that must not be ignored during fertility treatment.…”
Section: Epidemiology and Clinical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between CE and infertility has recently emerged as an important clinical challenge. In fact, 2.8–56.8% of infertile women, 14–67.5% of women with RIF, and 9.3–67.6% of women with recurrent pregnancy loss are diagnosed with CE . Considering these high prevalence rates, CE is a condition that must not be ignored during fertility treatment.…”
Section: Epidemiology and Clinical Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 135 subjects were included in this study. It represented an extension of our earlier series involving 93 subjects in the study of CE 13 and 97 subjects in the study of uNK cell 5 in women with recurrent miscarriage. The demographic details of the subjects are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Results Demographicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this study, CD56+ immune-staining was used to identify uNK cells. As described in previous studies, 5,13 paraffin-embedded human endometrial tissue sections were dewaxed in xylene, rehydrated through descending ethanol to Tris-buffered saline and unmasking of antigen in citrate buffer. The primary antibody was a mouse antihuman monoclonal primary anti-CD56 antibody (NCL-CD56-504; Novacastra Laboratories, Newcastle, UK) at a dilution of 1:100.…”
Section: Immunohistochemical Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations