2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.04.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the pp → π + pn and pp → π + d production rates

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On general grounds one expects that close to threshold the C 2 parameter should vary like Q and C 4 like Q 2 . The obvious deviation from this rule seen in Fig 5 is in the value of C 2 in the lowest Q-bin, which shows that higher pn partial waves are important for Q even below 20 MeV [6] and this might be connected with the strong tensor force in the spin-triplet pn system.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Ppmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…On general grounds one expects that close to threshold the C 2 parameter should vary like Q and C 4 like Q 2 . The obvious deviation from this rule seen in Fig 5 is in the value of C 2 in the lowest Q-bin, which shows that higher pn partial waves are important for Q even below 20 MeV [6] and this might be connected with the strong tensor force in the spin-triplet pn system.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Ppmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The angular distribution shown in Fig. 4 proves that this is not a valid assumption for Q < 20 MeV in the pp → pnπ + case [6] and there are similar doubts for pp → ΛpK + when Q < 40 MeV [15].…”
Section: Determining the Neutron-proton Scattering Parameters Frmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations