2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of the pharmacological properties of human and rat histamine H3-receptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with this concept, the human and rat H 3 receptors recombinantly expressed in, e.g., SK-N-MC neuroblastoma cells, are negatively coupled to cAMP accumulation (Lovenberg et al, 1999. The human H 3 receptor and rat H 3 receptor expressed in Sf9 insect cells couple equally well to G i1 , G i2 , G i3 , and G o1 as assessed by measurement of steady-state GTPase activity upon H 3 receptor/G protein coexpression (Schnell et al, 2010).…”
Section: B Signal Transduction Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In agreement with this concept, the human and rat H 3 receptors recombinantly expressed in, e.g., SK-N-MC neuroblastoma cells, are negatively coupled to cAMP accumulation (Lovenberg et al, 1999. The human H 3 receptor and rat H 3 receptor expressed in Sf9 insect cells couple equally well to G i1 , G i2 , G i3 , and G o1 as assessed by measurement of steady-state GTPase activity upon H 3 receptor/G protein coexpression (Schnell et al, 2010).…”
Section: B Signal Transduction Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In particular, a β2-adrenergic receptor based H3R model was used to understand the species-differences in pharmacological properties of imoproxifan (inverse agonist at rat H3R, but almost full agonist at human H3R) [13]. The molecular modelling studies suggested that both amino acid differences in TM3, at position 3.37 and 3.40, are responsible for the differences in imoproxifan pharmacology.…”
Section: H3 Receptormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The availability of these structures allowed the development of better quality homology models especially for the H3 [13] and H4 [14] receptors. Finally, the first X-ray structure of the histamine H1 receptor appeared in 2011 [15] that, together with other high resolution GPCR structures, provided a solid basis for the structure-based design of ligands acting on H1, H3 and H4 receptors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baculoviruses encoding mH 4 R, hH 4 R, and hH 3 R were prepared as described (Schneider et al 2009;Schnell et al 2010;Schnell et al 2011). The cDNAs of mH 4 R and hH 4 R were labeled N-terminally by a Flag-epitope and C-terminally by a hexahistidine (His 6 )-tag and cloned into pcDNA3.1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%